So I guess Wynn missed the part on the sworn statement in proof of loss where it says, "The said loss did not originate by any act, design or procurement on the part of your insured". Wouldn't his sticking a finger through the painting be an act on the part of the insured?
2 comments:
So I guess Wynn missed the part on the sworn statement in proof of loss where it says, "The said loss did not originate by any act, design or procurement on the part of your insured". Wouldn't his sticking a finger through the painting be an act on the part of the insured?
Wow, dude. You want a job? Very easy isn't it. All claims comes down to is reading a freaking policy.
Post a Comment